Save up to 40%

When Buying Hearthstone Packs!

Limited Time Offer from Amazon!

Rating  9

Contributed by


Guide Type

Last Updated

September 7, 2015

Table of Contents

In-Depth Turn Analysis #17: 7 Isn’t Always the Lucky Number



Hi guys! Welcome to Episode 17 of In-Depth Turn Analysis. For more information about the series and/or to see a list of previous episodes please click here.

  • This week’s deck: Dragon Freeze Mage
  • This week’s contributors:  Stonekeep, Smashthings

This week we’re gonna analyze an interesting match. Our deck is Dragon Freeze Priest and we’re playing a match against what’s probably a Midrange or Control Paladin. The difficulty of this turn comes mainly from the fact that we have quite a few options and we don’t how much heal we can expect from our opponent. What’s important to note is that Paladin has 7 minions on the board, so keep that in mind when you think about the play.

Also, if you want to submit your own position, you can read about it here in the “Reader Submissions” section.

Okay, Let’s begin!

About This Week’s Deck

The deck used in this episode is:

Jaina; Mother of Dragons
Class Cards (12)8780
Frostbolt 2
Sorcerer’s Apprentice 2
Frost Nova 3
Effigy 3
Duplicate 3
Ice Barrier 3
Fireball 4
Rhonin 8
Neutral Cards (18)
Mad Scientist 2
Doomsayer 2
Acolyte of Pain 3
Twilight Drake 4
Twilight Guardian 4
Azure Drake 5
Blackwing Corruptor 5
Emperor Thaurissan 6
Chillmaw 7
Malygos 9
Alexstrasza 9

The deck was created by Smashthings as a pre-TGT brew. After the expansion was launched, he tested the list in battle and updated it accordingly. ta

You can learn more about the deck by clicking on the following link:

Quick deck guide

The Situation

Okay, so let’s look at the position shall we?

In actual games, positions have context beyond the deck you are using. In an effort to make this series more realistic and less ‘puzzle-like’ let’s talk about a few cards that have been used in the game so far and any other little bits of information that seem relevant.




KEY CARDS USED (YOU): Coin, Mad Scientist x2, , Ice Barrier x2, Twilight Drake, Blackwing Corruptor, Twilight Guardian x2, Duplicate

KEY CARDS USED (OPPONENT): Muster for Battle, Piloted Shredder, Loatheb, Consecration, Sylvanas Windrunner, Truesilver Champion, Aldor Peacekeeper, Antique Healbot, Dr. Boom.


Armed with this information, you must now start to think about the needs/peculiarities of both the position and the match-up. Get busy thinking! In the next section we will see what some of us at HSP thought about the position and what they think is the best play.

Strawpoll Voting

Before Reading the Analysis, why not vote on what you think the best play is?


The voting is mostly for fun and you don’t need to take it seriously. It’s just to compare your line of thinking with the others and then with opinion of our team!

Stonekeep’s Analysis

So, there are a lot of ways in which you can play out this turn, but I have five of them in my mind. Obviously some of them are weaker and some are stronger, but I’ve picked only those who make at least some sense. Let’s start going through our possibilities!

Option 1: Play Malygos.

It might seem like this option makes no sense, but sometimes you can do that. You generally want to play Malygos on the turn you also play some damage spells to get guaranteed Spell Damage value. +5 is a huge boost and you don’t want to risk getting it killed. But if enemy isn’t likely to kill it and you have lethal next turn thanks to that, it might work out just fine.

Enemy has 15 damage on the board (plus some random Boom Bot damage). You have two 6 health Taunts (Twilight Guardians), so with Malygos the total toughness of your board would be 24. Even with the Consecration or Quartermaster in his hand, enemy would need Boom Bot to hit perfectly in order to kill your Malygos.

You get down enemy to 18 health, and next turn you have 4 damage from Malygos + 8 from Frostbolt + 11 from Fireball + 1 from Hero Power, so even if you don’t draw any more damage, you can deal 24, easily threatening lethal.

The play, however, is pretty bad, because right now Malygos is your main win condition. You can play Malygos without getting value only if you need to take risk. Here, the risk is too high – Equality completely ruins your board and puts you into a pretty bad spot. Consecration + Truesilver Champion is much less likely, because enemy has used one of each already, but if he has both of them, once again, your board is ruined. Another thing that can work against you is Quartermaster + some more damage (Consecration or Truesilver). Enemy could run the Antique Healbot into one of your Drakes, use the Quartermaster and then easily clear your whole board in case he has just a little more damage.

So, overall the play is pretty bad – you don’t want to risk enemy killing your win condition if you don’t have to.

Option 2: Frost Nova + Doomsayer (+ Azure Drake)

Oh, one of the strongest board clears in Mage. Enemy board is rather threatening and you’d really like to get rid of it. Frost Nova + Doomsayer seems like a pretty solid option. But is it really?

If the Doomsayer triggers (it’s not removed/Silenced), the obvious merit would be getting the initiative on the empty board. You could then play the Emperor Thaurissan on an empty board – that’s really strong. Paladin has really hard time dealing 5 damage with no board presence, so there is a chance it would give you two procs. Repopulating the board after that shouldn’t really be hard either.

Normally, Doomsayer is weak against Silence, but not in this case. Enemy has 7 minions on the board. It means that there is no room to play Silence – he is forced to have Equality + Consecration (or Avenging Wrath in case his build runs it) combo in order to kill the Doomsayer. Doomsayer is likely to go off in this scenario. But there are couple of problems with this play.

The first problem with this play is that you have the board yourself. So if it procs, you’re losing two rather strong 4-drops. The second problem is that you aren’t accomplishing much this turn. Yes, you clear enemy board, but it’s not as threatening as it looks in the first place. You’re at 29 health behind 12 health Taunts – you aren’t really scared that enemy is gonna kill you. And third – you’re taking a long game route. You don’t set up anything, you won’t have a way to kill enemy next turn no matter what you draw. And taking a long game against Paladin is not always a good thing to do. We are not sure whether we’re playing against the Midrange build or the slower, Control one. The cards he played can be used in both of those. We’re not sure how much healing he has – if we give him a time to draw into cards like Lay on Hands or Tuskarr Jouster, he can actually get out of burn range pretty quickly.

There is also a good way about taking a long route, to be fair. Since you play Rhonin in your deck, drawing into it can make a huge difference. Three copies of Arcane Missiles combined with Malygos can lead to a lot of damage. In case you hold the Emperor Thaurissan and hit all the Missiles with him, you can threaten 24 random damage thanks to the combo.

Additional thing that needs to be considered – do we play Azure Drake? On the one hand, there is no point in playing a minion when you Doomsayer. But on the other, Azure Drake cycles itself. You want to draw into your burn, so playing Azure Drake would be a solid choice. But remember that if you’re in a spot like that, play the draw mechanic first. Maybe the thing you draw would change your initial play and there would be a better thing to do than Frost Nova + Doomsayer? I think that I’d cycle the Azure if I made a play like that.

But the play isn’t really thrilling. It’s pretty slow and it backfires by killing your own guys. I can see some merit – playing Emperor Thaurissan on an empty board against Paladin feels pretty good. But I still wouldn’t go for it.

Option 3: Azure Drake + Sorcerer's Apprentice + Fireball the Dr. Boom

This play combines developing the board + removing the biggest threat enemy has. You reduce the total damage enemy has from 15 to 8 – a big difference. Without additional tools, Paladin couldn’t even get through your Taunts on the board.

It’s a pretty nice tempo play, you significantly shift the board’s strength in your favor. Enemy needs to find an answer or he’s in a pretty rough spot.

The good side of the play is that you’re in the lead on the board, meaning enemy has to start playing defensively. You threaten a lot of damage next turn so he might be forced to Heal instead of actually developing something strong.

The are again a few problems with this play, though. First and the most obvious one is that you don’t set up lethal. Even in the best case scenario, where enemy doesn’t have any removals etc. and he can just get rid of one of your Drakes, it’s not enough. Enemy Paladin is gonna be at 18 health. You’re gonna have 3 + 3 + 4 = 10 damage on the board, +4 from Frostbolt + 1 from Hero Power = 15. You’d be 3 damage off lethal. And that’s best case scenario.

Worst case scenario, enemy has Equality, which really wrecks you. Enemy clears your whole board and is at 18 health. He has 8 mana after Equality to develop the board further.

You also use your burn as a removal. Having a Fireball in your hand means that you can much easier threaten lethal – you can do 10 damage from your hand.

So I don’t like this play. When the play is only “fine” in the best case scenario and it can lose you the game in the worst case (which isn’t that unlikely, since Paladin hasn’t used Equality yet) I wouldn’t recommend it.

Option 4: Emperor Thaurissan + Sorcerer's Apprentice + Frost Nova

A very interesting option. This is a pretty good Emperor Thaurissan hand – Malygos, Frostbolt and Fireball are exactly the cards you want to discount.

Two things make the play really appealing. The first thing is setting up easy lethal. In case your board stays that way and doesn’t get removed – you have 3 + 3 + 3 + 5 = 14 damage on the board. Thanks to the Thaurissan’s discount and Sorcerer’s Apprentice on the board, next turn you can also play Malygos (for 8) + Fireball (for 2) + Frostbolt (for 0) for additional 19 damage. That means you’re threatening a total of 33 damage. Even if Paladin somehow heals to full (like 2x Holy Light) he’s still dead.

The second thing is that Paladin has full, frozen board. He can’t play any more minions. He can’t heal up, he can’t Silence, he can’t combo Equality with Knife Juggler (in case he has no Consecration). He can play spells or pass.

So, the two most obvious things Paladin can do is either Lay on Hands or Equality + Consecration. In the first case, he loses the game. There is nothing he can draw to survive and healing to 26 makes no difference. The second case is his only option to survive. You force him to have the combo or to lose the game. Since Paladin is out of one Consecration already and his hand size isn’t huge, it’s quite likely that you just won the game.

But! What if he plays the combo and clears your board? You’re still in an okay spot. You don’t have the lethal on the next turn, but there are a few things going your way. First, you can ping the Dr. Boom to kill him. Second, you can start cycling with the Azure Drake – you still have a lot of options. Another Fireball and Frostbolt as a burn. Second Frost Nova (paired with Doomsayer) or Chillmaw to clear the board. And Paladin is left with only 3 cards in his hand, meaning that they have to be really good in order for him to contest the board lead. With Equality out of the way, if you manage to clear Paladin’s board, you should be able to just play Malygos. Paladin has no way of getting through 12 health minion without Equality or great board control, meaning it’s likely gonna survive, and you would be able to unleash the rest of your spells to kill him.

Option 5: Play Emperor Thaurissan/Azure Drake + Sorcerer's Apprentice + Frostbolt the Dr. Boom.

This is kinda a middle-ground play. First, you need to decide whether you want to play Emperor Thaurissan or Azure Drake. Both of them have merits, but what’s more important, both of them set up the lethal if enemy has no answer.

It’s similar to option 3, but this time you’re not clearing the Dr. Boom. You’re just freezing it and saving additional damage as the burn. With Azure Drake, you have 10 damage on the board + 7 from Fireball + 1 from Hero Power for an exact lethal if enemy has no way to heal or deal with your board. With Emperor Thaurissan, you have 11 damage on the board + Malygos with Frostbolt for additional 8 damage = 19 in total. Again, setting up lethal in case enemy has no answer.

But this time, Equality is not the only answer. You bank on enemy not having anything – if he does, you’re screwed. Dr. Boom is still alive, even though it’s at 3/4 health, it can trade into something later. So if you won’t win next turn, you put yourself in a pretty bad spot.

It’s a high risk play – it loses to a lot of things, Equality, Consecration, Truesilver Champion, Quartermaster, Loatheb (gives Paladin one more turn) Lay on Hands (or another ways to heal). It’s really unlikely that Paladin doesn’t have ANY of those.

So, this play is rather bad. I really dislike it. You’re risking too much when you could just set up lethal in another way.


There is no way to set-up guaranteed lethal, so we have to take some risks here no matter what.

Overall, I think the option 4 is definitely the best one. It loses only to Equality + Consecration combo which is quite unlikely. Every other option also loses to the same thing and most of them have much more flaws imo. It sets up lethal even if enemy heals to full and in case he clears your board, you aren’t in terrible shape and you can still come back.

The second best option is option 2 – even though you sacrifice your two minions (three if you cycle Azure Drake), the Doomsayer is really hard to counter and you gain the board initiative. In case enemy counters your Doomsayer with the Equality play, you still have a lot of options and you can set up the Emperor in another way. You bank on your advantage in the long game, which can not work against a slow Paladin deck. But in case he plays more Midrange version, your late game is superior to his.

Rest of the options I don’t really like. They’re all risky – either not setting up lethal, throwing away your win conditions or just losing hard against a lot of different cards. Options 4 and 2 only lose against Equality + Consecration, but the rest of them are waaaay too easy to counter.

What’s really interesting is that Paladin’s full board might actually be a handicap in this case, not an advantage. Less experienced players often don’t consider how important board slots are. Against slow Mage deck like Freeze Mage or Echo/Giants Mage, you often want to have free board slots in case you need to play Loatheb, Antique Healbot or Ironbeak Owl.

Smashthings’ Analysis

Okay, this position has a large number of possible moves, far too many infact to go through the list and analyse each play one-by-one.

In the past when I have analysed positions like this I usually try to reason about the position ‘strategically’. By understanding the strategical aims and desires of a deck/position you can sometimes dismiss a lot of the options.

For example in Episode #9 of the series (warning; spoilers incoming!) I reasoned that as a Grim Patron Warrior I couldn’t use Execute on that turn because Execute was a crucial card in getting past the big Taunts of Handlock.

In short, I’m not going to sit here and type out all the options, rather, I’m going to spend most of my time talking about the deck and the position in a more ‘general sense’.

Option #1 Malygos

This is probably one of the easiest plays to dismiss.

It is easy to dismiss Malygos here on strategical grounds: Malygos is the win condition, and using it right now does not win the game.

The usual plan with Malygos is that you reduce the cost of spells (via Emperor Thaurissan and/or Sorcerer’s Apprentice) and then burn their face for a metric shit-tonne of damage (e.g Malygos + Apprentice + Arcane Missiles x3 = 24 damage).

But in this particular position we don’t have the right spells to make Malygos a powerful play.  In short, using Malygos here doesn’t help us win the game.

Option #2 Sorcerer's Apprentice + ??

Since the Apprentice is only two mana we could play so many cards alongside her.

For example:

  • Thuarissan + Apprentice + Frostbolt
  • Apprentice + Doomsayer + Frost Nova + Frostbolt + Hero Power

That’s just two possible options (out of several) and moreover the above two plays can be further dissected (e.g. “What do we Frostbolt?”, “What do we do with the Dragons on board?”).

Basically, there are numerous ways we could weave this card into the present turn, and that makes analysis time consuming and difficult.

But with that said, if we think about the deck/position strategically we can side-step most of this discussion.  Soo….

“Why is Apprentice in the deck?”

I added Apprentice to the deck because of the synergy she has with some of other cards in the deck (most notably Thaurissan, Malygos, and the Arcane Missiles we get from Rhonin).

Rhonin is a turn 8 play which therefore means in the games where we play Thaurissan on curve we are unlikely to get the free Arcane Missiles to play with Malygos on Turns 9/10.  And it is in these situations that Apprentice comes in handy, since if Malygos and/or Apprentice are in the hand when we play Thaurissan that means we have the ability to use Arcane Missiles for zero mana on Turn 10.

In short, the role this card fills in the deck is “combo-enabler”.  Ideally we want to play Malygos + Apprentice on the same turn and smack the enemy with a flurry of cheap spells.

If however, we play Apprentice right now then we don’t get that ‘combo value’.

So now I think I can propose a really simply rule of thumb that makes analysis easy: Since this card is a combo enabler, we should save the card UNLESS we can find a very compelling reason to play her. 

So sure, we can play her this turn and Frostbolt something for 1 mana, or whatever. But personally I don’t see a line of play where playing Apprentice is absolutely necessary.

In short; if we don’t need to play Apprentice we shouldn’t play Apprentice.

Option #3 Frostbolt something + ??

Again, with Apprentice, Malygos and Thuarissan in hand it is really tempting to try and not use this card since it could potentially be used as part of a game-winning combo.

Thus, much of what I said about Apprentice is applicable here too: we should be predisposed to saving the Frostbolt. Thus, if we are going to use this card we need to find a bloody good reason to do so.

In the Current position Dr. Boom is the only Frostbolt target that makes any sense.

“Should We Frostbolt  Dr. Boom?”

Well, I think we do need to find a way to deal with Dr. Boom, but is Frostbolt the best way of achieving that aim?  I’m not sure that it is. I’ll talk about dealing with Dr. Boom a bit later on.

Option #4 + ??

Thaurissan looks like a strong play, we reduce the cost of a lot of cards and we also have enough mana to do other things this turn as well, such as:

With Thuarissan + Frost Nova we prevent the Paladin from using his board, and by hiding Thaurissan behind two taunts the Paladin would need Equality + Consecration (and remember one copy of the latter card has already been used this game) in order to prevent us from getting multiple Thuarissan procs.

So this sounds like a good deal, really good in fact. However, I feel that there are two basic drawbacks:

  1. The cheaper cards do not give us lethal (yet)
  2. If we Freeze the board this turn then (unless we top-deck something) we don’t have board clear combos for next turn.

Let’s look at point (1) quickly. Sure Thuarissan enables us to play Malygos + Frostbolt next turn but this is nowhere enough damage to win the game. And since we cannot deal lethal damage we will be forced to fight for the board next turn.

In short, using Frost Nova as a ‘tempo-play’ is fine in situations where you can use that tempo to quickly win the game, but now is not the time for such shenanigans.

If we had two copies of Frost Nova in hand then Thaurissan + Frost Nova is a play I would consider seriously. But as it is I am not convinced that this is a good time for Thuarissan, it is probably better to wait and see if we can lower the cost of more relevant cards.

We could also play Thuarissan + Fireball (on Dr. Boom). I will talk about this play when I talk about the role of Fireball.

Option #5:  Draw with Azure Drake + ??

Drawing cards is reasonable, and with 5 mana remaining we have some flexibility for the rest of the turn. We could, for example, use the remaining mana to Fireball Dr. Boom (more on this later)

We could also draw into a card that might make us change the plan over the next few turns (e.g. Alexstrasza, Rhonin) or maybe we could draw into something immediately useful, such as the 2nd copy of Frost Nova.

All things considered, Drake is a decent play but is only “worth it” in a few situations:

  1. If we draw something good.
  2. If we use the rest of our mana to good effect.

In short, Azure Drake is a play we make when we are confident we know what we are doing with the rest of the turn/mana. At the moment though, we haven’t figured out exactly what we want to do this turn. So this play goes on the back burner, for now at least.

Options #6:  Fireball + (Hero Power / Azure Drake) Dr. Boom

On the face of it, this play looks rather reasonable; after killing Dr. Boom we can also use our 2x 3/6 Dragons to trade into the rest of the board, giving us good board control.

The problem with this play is more a question:

“Is this the best way to kill Dr. Boom?”

With Malygos, Apprentice and Thurassian in hand that Fireball could be potentially used to win the game (e.g imagine If we play Malygos and it survives a turn). If we fireball Dr. Boom instead we rule out that burst finish option.

So, if our goal is to Kill Dr. Boom is Fireball truly the best way? We could use our minions + Hero Power or we could also try Frostnova alongside Doomsayer. Speaking of which…

Option 7: Doomsayer + Frost Nova + ??

As I have already alluded to Dr. Boom is a threat but it is not clear that we would want to deal with this minion by using burn spells (since burn spells = potential win condition). The Doomsayer combo meanwhile deals with the threat whilst also keeping our burn in the hand.

Okay enough chatter, let’s look at the line of play I actually took:

My Actual chosen play:

Now, I’m sure plenty of you are wondering why I played the Azure Drake when I knew I wanted to play Doomsayer. Doesn’t this play just waste a card?  The short answer is yes, it does waste a card.

But… I think there are in fact a few good reasons to play Azure Drake here:

  1. If they kill Doomsayer, we have an extra minion on the board.
  2. Look at our hand; this game is probably going to finish quickly. Ergo losing the Drake isn’t really a problem since if we don’t play it now we are probably never playing the card this game.
  3. Game Psychology: By putting lots of minions on the board, our opponent is less likely to try and counter Doomsayer.

At first glance it might appear that we get completely wrecked by Equality + Consecration, but even in this case (which is the worst case) next turn we could Hero Power Dr. Boom and maybe Frostbolt something else.  So basically the worst case scenario is not even that terrible for us.

The real power of this play is only realised when you think about the likely response from the Paladin (which is probably just Equip Weapon and Pass), he basically does almost nothing for a turn and we get to play Thaurissan on an empty board.  And as I’m sure plenty of you are aware Paladin struggles to deal with 5/5 minions without minions on board. Thus, there is a decent chance that we get two (or more) Thaurissan procs.  And that puts us in a very good position to win the game.

Basically, my proposed play is about sacrificing all our minions for a chance at seizing the initiative. Initiative + burn-combos in hand leaves the Paladin almost defenceless.

…In the End…

In this section we show/tell you about what actually happened during the game. Click on the spoiler to find out!


And that conclude’s this week’s instalment of In-depth Turn Analysis.  Feel free to leave a comment letting us know what you think about the position, the series, our opinions, etc.

And if you like it, don’t forget to leave a thumbs up!

Enjoyed this article?

Playing Hearthstone since September 2013. Infinite Arena player. Hitting Legend rank on EU each season, with multiple high Legend climbs during the season and top 200-300 finishes.

Learn and Improve Your Game
Join Premium and Become Legend!

Over 400,000 people each month use Hearthstone Players to improve their Hearthstone skills.



Leave a Reply

  1. patrissimo says:

    My analysis matched Stonekeep’s, seems like we all agree. Setting up lethal for next turn, with only one combo that stops it, and plenty of ways to win even if that happens, is just awesome. I think the frost/doom play is decent too; it doesn’t put us in a bad spot.

  2. geniekid says:

    Like always I appreciate the independent analyses by multiple HSP authors. It’s hard to analyze a complex situation flawlessly so having multiple perspectives to mitigate individual oversights is a good thing.

    The thing I took away from this article (i.e. the thing I did not consider at all) was the merit of playing Azure Drake alongside Doomsayer. It highlights the importance of keeping your win conditions in mind instead of trying to extract maximum value out of individual cards. Pro thinking :)

    • Stonekeep HSP says:

      I’m glad you enjoy the series! :) It’s really nice that others can learn by reading our points of view. We plan to push out those regularly. And remember that if you are in a difficult situation with many, many options – take a screenshot and send it to us, so we can analyze it!

  3. reboshua says:

    sorry, that should say “1 attack” instead of 4 attack, sorry

    • geniekid says:

      If I had to guess I’d say the Twilight Drake was played by the Mage, then Aldored by the Paladin, then stolen by the Paladin via Sylvanas later on.

  4. reboshua says:

    n00b question, but how is the pally Twilight Drake a 4 attack instead of a 4 attack?

    • Stonekeep HSP says:

      Twilight Drake was originally on the Mage’s side. Paladin first used an Aldor Peacekeeper on it to reduce its attack to 1. Later, it was stolen by Sylvanas Windrunner and that’s how it got on the Paladin’s side of the board.

  5. Anonymous says:

    Once the board was clear, wasn’t it better to just play malygos on empty board having 30 damage from hand? Since he wasn’t able to clear the doomsayer it was likely the same happened with malygos, and that would’ve meant you had leathal even if he healed or taunted.

    • Stonekeep HSP says:

      Silence. The only way to deal with Doomsayer board was Equality, because he didn’t have enough space on the board. And since he didn’t play any Silence this game yet, there was a pretty high chance that he had one in his hand.

      I know that Silencing Malygos doesn’t exactly “deal” with it, but it removes the Spell Damage part, which is huge. 4/12 minion is still good, but it wouldn’t be lethal.

      It turned out that enemy probably didn’t have Silence, but still, throwing away one of your main win conditions when you aren’t sure that you’re gonna kill the enemy is still pretty risky.

      Your line of thinking is not bad and it’s definitely a play you can consider, I just think that setting up Emperor on the empty board and then later having a guaranteed OTK with Malygos from your hand is a good way to go.

      • Smashthings says:

        Also, it you check the video notice that after Freeze Nova the Paladin Draws 3 cards from Lay on Hands.

        So…if he did have silence he could not play it due to having 7 minions on the board. and if he did not have silence in hand he could have drawn into it.

        Usually with this deck Malygos is the “last resort”… you drop her only when your are desperate and are looking for a lucky break (or just have lethal).

        In the position after the board clear I figured I was likely to get 2 triggers from Thuarissan, and in my opinion thats a lot more powerful than simply dropping Malygos and hoping he doesn’t have a counter.

        • Stonekeep HSP says:

          Well, actually, Paladin got 5 cards deeper into the deck. One on the turn where the board was frozen, 3 from Lay on hands and 1 on the next turn (where you’d play Malygos instead of Emperor). That’s 5 more draws to get Silence AND Equality. So it was really likely that Paladin had some answer for him. Equality + Consecration/Truesilver/Muster For Battle/Knife Juggler could deal with it in a clean way.

          So I obviously agree with playing Emperor. Emperor on the empty board where enemy can’t deal with it is one of the best feelings ever.

  6. Pig2Face says:

    It would be nice to know excactly what turn this happend on, to calculate the risk of him having equality + cons, still a good analysis of the different options, even though it seems pretty obvious that thaurissan + apprentice + nova is the correct play cause it sets up for a nice lethal the following turn 😉

  7. Smashthings says:

    So as you can see guys, Stonekeep and I disagreed on what the ‘correct play’ is this week.

    For what its worth, I actually think Stonekeep’s suggestion (his option 4) is actually superior to my own idea.

    Truth be told I did not even consider this line of play. Perhaps the interesting question to ask is “why/how I missed this possible play”.

    I think I missed this blow-out tactical shot because I was focusing on “long-term” Strategy. And in my opinion this is a really good practical technique for solving complex problems under time pressure.

    In real games you only have a handful of seconds to come up with a plan. Thus, in complex positions like this it is can be really hard (impossible, perhaps) to calculate every option. If you feel that you cannot calculate everything in time the next best practical try is just to rely on ‘heuristic thinking’ (i.e. ‘rules of thumb’).

    During the game I quickly (almost instantly, in fact) dismissed a number of plays based upon my understanding of the deck (e.g. understanding win conditions, which cards you want Thaurissan to make cheap, etc). This way of thinking saves you a lot of time and a lot requires less mental effort than calculation. But on the downside, you sometimes miss the very technical moves, which was the case here.

    In short I missed Stonekeeps play because I dismissed the very idea of play Apprentice before I even checked to see if it was any good. :)

    With all this said, my play was good enough to go one and win the game, and that is despite my opponent having a few good plays (e.g. Lay on Hands followed up with Tirion).

    • Oscar says:

      And your win was way more fun!
      I was actually wondering why you didn’t do that play honestly, but I’m glad you did not!
      I was looking forward for a deck like this! Thanks

    • Stonekeep HSP says:

      My play was the first one that occured to me. I did a quick calculation of how much damage I’m gonna have next turn (~30) and decided that it’s the one.

      I just like to finish the games as soon as I can and take opportunities when I see one. I agree with Oscar that the long game was much more fun and the Malygos + Arcane Missiles is pretty priceless 😀

      I’ve rated your play as the second best, because well, they were pretty close. Both were winning plays and both lost only to Equality + Consecration. It was just trying to finish the game fast vs going into a long game.

      But honestly, even though the “correct” play came to me pretty fast, when I’ve started analyzing the scenario I’ve really seen the pros and cons of this and other plays. Analyzing the screenshots is so different than playing the actual game – normally you have like a minute to make up your mind. Here, I can think 2 hours and analyze every possible move. I agree that taking he “longer” route is often a correct thing to do if you can’t decide which move is the best. Stalling the game means you have more time to either think about a good move or you can draw something that completely changes everything.

      I also had pretty hard job with this one, because I’ve never played the Smash’s deck before. I only had a look at the decklist and that’s all. It’s easier to pick the plays if you actually had at least some experience with the deck. But I hope you all liked my writeup :)

      • Oscar says:

        I’d have done the same play you suggest as I would search for the fast win, too. I just did appreciate the outcome more with this other scenario because it had an amazing outcome and I couldn’t even think of Azure Drake+Frost Nova+Doomsayer being an option!
        Anyways keep up with this guides, they’re the best and always manage to let me see other plays from another prospective.